Podcasting since 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke

Showing posts with label VFO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VFO. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2024

Radio Items Picked-up at VWS Winterfest 2024 Hamfest

As always, click on image for a better view

Above you can see what I picked up at the Vienna Wireless Society's 2024 Winterfest Hamfest. 

-- On the left in the blue box is an MXM Industries SuperRX/TX 40 transceiver. It is a kit from a Texas company.   Superhet receiver with IF at 455 kHz.  Crystal controlled CW transmitter on 7040 kHz.  The oscillator works, but so far no receive signals.  I will have to troubleshoot.  Does anyone have a schematic? 

-- Behind the MXM there is a nice box marked "Diode Detector" I opened it up and there is just a solid state diode and a 50 ohm resistor to ground.   Box may be useful. 

-- I got a couple of books: "Weekend Projects" 1979 from ARRL, and "A History of QST -- Volume 1 Amateur Radio Technology 1915 - 2013" 2013 from ARRL. 

-- On top of the Weekend Projects book you see a "Crystal Holder" from Gross Radio of New York City.  W1UJR has some good history on this company:  https://w1ujr.com/written-word/gross-radio-company-circa-1931/  This device seem to be intended to hold in place a raw piece of quartz!  Cool. 

-- To the right of the books there is a serious-looking VFO.  One dollar!  Deal!  It is a CB VFO, but the markings say it puts out 5.44 to 5.99 MHz.  So it should be useful.  The dual speed dial is very nice.  

-- Above the VFO is a nice step attenuator from the "Arrow Antenna" company of Loveland Colorado. 

-- Further to the right are some Electric Radio and Antique Wireless Association magazines that Armand WA1UQO gave me.  Really nice.  The AWA mags have a very thoughtful piece (warts and all) on Jean Shepherd.  And the ER pile has an article by Scott WA9WFA that mentions my work on the Mate for the Mighty Midget receiver.  Thanks again Armand! 

-- I also got some ADE6+ surface mount mixers.  The price was right! 

Thanks to VWS for putting on this great hamfest! 

Saturday, February 17, 2024

Nate KA1MUQ's Amazing Thermatron Receiver



Wow, some really wonderful work is taking place in Nate KA1MUQ's basement in California. 

-- I really like the pill bottle coil forms.  I wonder if Nate faced suspicion (and possible arrest) in the pharmacy when he asked for the pill bottles.  (I got some suspicious looks when I went I asked for empty pill bottles while building my thermatron Mate for the Mighty Midget receiver back in 1998.) 

-- The variable capacitors are also quite cool, as is the big rotary switch.   Is that for band switching? 

-- Oh  man, all on a plywood board.  Frank Jones would approve!  

-- Indeed Nate, that beautiful receiver NEEDS an analog VFO.  And we need to hear it inhaling phone sigs, not that FT8 stuff. 

-- Please keep us posted on your progress.  And of course, one hand behind your back OM.  Lots of high voltage on those thermatrons.  

Thanks Nate!  

Saturday, February 10, 2024

SolderSmoke Podcast #250 Dean KK4DAS joins Pete N6QW and Bill N2CQR


SolderSmoke Podcast # 250 is ready for download: 

http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke250.mp3

VIDEO VERSION: (1707) SolderSmoke Podcast #250 -- With Pete N6QW, Dean KK4DAS, and Bill N2CQR - YouTube

Intro:   Welcome to Dean KK4DAS.  For 2024 Pete and I hope to jazz things up a bit by bringing in fellow homebrewers to talk about their projects.  Dean is our first victim.  Welcome Dean. 

Some good news:  Several new homebrew receivers are inhaling:  Armand WA1UQO in Richmond has an amazing looking regen.  Scott KQ4AOP in Tennessee got his DC RX working.  Mike AG5VG in Texas has been homebrewing BITX 20s and BITX 40s.  All are on the blog.  

Pete's report: 

-- Recent blog entries on filters,  SSB rig architecture, and of course digital VFOs. 

-- Phasing measurements, quadrature, and the Seeed Xiao RP2040

-- Error in QST article on early SSB transceiver.  ANOTHER ERROR!

--LC VFO on blog!  FB Pete!  

Dean's report:  

-- Tales of woe on the homebrew sBITX

-- Help from Farhan.  

-- Ground Bounce.  FFT Hallucinations.   Wisdom files.

SHAMELESS COMMERCE DIVISION:   

-- Whenever you are tempted to buy something from AMAZON, just start at the Amazon symbol on the right side of the page.  We get a cut from Bezos, and it doesn't cost you anything.  

-- You can try to do the same thing with E-bay.  We are finding a lot of great parts there. 

-- If you see a SolderSmoke post on Facebook,  please Like and forward. 

-- Become a patron!  Go to the Patreon page.  We put the money to good SolderSmoke use. 

-- Visit Mostly DIY RF and buy a PSSST kit!  

Bill's bench:  

-- Building yet another BITX dual bander.  15-10 again. Tried to use a 25 MHz filter left over from the earlier project, but I had to build another.  Built a new VFO using the variable cap and anti-backlash gear recommended by Pete.  Was a bit tough to get the receiver sounding good.   Had a diode ring as the second mixer, but went back to a singly balanced mixer. 

-- 10 meter AM -- Thanks to Jerry Coffman K5JC for mod. 

Other topics: 

--Counterfeit chips.  Why? 

MAILBAG: 

Wes W7ZOI 

Jim Cook W8NSA  Transoceanic BFO

Grayson KJ7UM -- Vintage Computer Museum

Chuck Adams --Glad to hear that Chuck is doing well.  

Frank Harris  K0IYE --  NO CHIPS!!!! 

ED DD5LP  Antenna software

Eldon KC5U  10 AM We  made a contact

Joh DL6ID  10 AM   

Phil   W1PJE of MIT   10AM   Where is L5? 

Bob WP4BQV now in UK 

Dino Papas KL0S in Wilmington   Reverse Polarity protection. 

AA7EE Dave Richards  Liked Armand's receiver

Rogier PA1ZZ  

Jonathan-san W0XO  Listened to my ET-2 CW Whoop,whoop

Nick M0NTV  Great videos from Nick the Vic

Will KI4POV  Working on his own SSB rigs.  

John West -- Who is the South American ham who made his capacitors and heat sinks? 

Ed KC8SBV  Working on DC receiver, experimenting with FETs 

Mike WN2A great contributions.  Si5351 sole source danger! 

Nick N3FJZ -- watch out for dead bands when testing receivers! 

Don KM4UDX encouragement from new Prez of VWS

Dave K8WPE Likes QF1 Cap backlash.  Says I'm getting soft! 

Dave WA1LBP My fellow Hambassador, from Okinawa USMC Sergeant with a workshop. 

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Videos from Mike AG5VG -- His Homebrew BITX Rigs


Here are two great videos from Mike AG5VG showing his two homebrew receivers in action.  (The transmitter portions of Farhan's circuit will come later.) See yesterday's post for more details. 

On the video above (40 meters) 
-- I love that speaker.  
--  The enclosure and the reduction drive for the VFO is really great.  FB OM. 
-- Very cool that Mike captures a 40 meter QSO with "Wild Bill" ZS6CCY in South Africa, someone who we've spoken to many times, often on the long path, sometimes from Mozambique. 
-- I like how Mike demonstrates the effect of removing the antenna.  You can definitely see what we mean when we say you should be able to "hear the band noise."   
  

Above you see the 20 meter receiver in action.  You can see one of the physical benefits of using a wooden base:  You can easily mount connectors, switches and tuning controls using just pieces of copper-clad board screwed into the wood.   This is what I am doing with my latest BITX 15-10 rig. 

For the tuning of the VFO, it looks to me as if Mike has a large "main tuning" control in the center, with a smaller "fine tuning" or "bandspread" control off to the left.  Does that smaller control work with a varactor diode or with a smaller variable cap?  Also, to the right of the main tuning control we see a 3 pole switch.  Is that switch putting additional L or C into the VFO circuit to move the frequency around?  These techniques would all be quite valid;  Mike demonstrates that there are many ways to skin a cat (or tune a VFO!) 

Mike:  Please send more info. 

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Pine Boards, Analog VFOs, and Homebrew BITX Transceivers -- AG5VG's Magnificent Creations

Click in image for a better view

This is amazingly cool.  WE ARE NOT ALONE!  There are others out there breaking the tyranny of the Si5351, building BITXs with analog LC VFOs.  And using copper clad boards affixed to pine boards. Plywood cabinetry!  And medicine bottle coil forms.  Really great.  And what a wonderful workshop. Thanks Michael.     

Good Afternoon Bill,


This is Michael Sahn, AG5VG.

I hope your doing well, all is well here in south Texas. I have recently built a bitx20 receiver and bitx20 for 40 meters receiver.

I built it using the analog VFO and both of mine are stable. What an awesome feeling it is to have a stable homebrew VFO. I have attached pictures .

It’s been a fun journey to get to this step. I have just been enjoying the receiver as Farhan instructed us. Then I’m going to go through the transmit side.

Air core coils are great for VFO. On my bitx40 I used a medicine bottle bottom but I put the VFO in a tin can as you will see in the pictures.

The bitx20 is all out, hand capacitance is a slight issue but it’s all learning experience.
Going to be adjusting the pvc coil bandpass filter inductors, I think the value is a bit off so it’s not as loud as it should be, but everything else is set good.

Just wanted to check in and great job on the videos and podcasts. I really enjoy them

73s
Michael

Click on image for a better view

Click on image for a better view

Friday, January 12, 2024

QF-1 Variable Capacitor Problem -- What Should I do?


For years I have been heartlessly slaughtering innocent Heathkit Q multipliers, just to get these variable capacitors. Dean KK4DAS has joined me in this mayhem. And recently Wes W4JYK has also started hunting down QF-1s.

I am sorry to report that my love for this variable capacitor has taken a hit.  The capacitance is perfect.  And it has a reduction drive built into the shaft.  But I have found that that reduction Drive has a form of backlash. It is really just a dead spot that you find when tuning in a signal. Turning in one direction, all is good.  But when you then try to turn in the other direction, you have to turn the shaft a bit before the cap blades begins to move (see video above).  This makes tuning SSB signals a bit difficult. 

What should I do? Should I pull out a Dremel and cut off the reduction drive, then use a better (external) reduction drive to move the vanes? Any other ideas?

These are the kinds of problems that homebrewers face...

 

Sunday, October 22, 2023

DIAL SCALE LINEARITY -- Spreading out the Frequencies for the 15-10 BITX Rig

Click on the image for a better view

The 15-10 Rig has been performing very well, pulling in a lot of DX contacts on both bands.  But there is one thing that has bothered me:  The way the transceiver tunes.  It can be a bit difficult getting an SSB station tuned in properly.  At first I thought this was caused by a lack of lubrication on the variable cap that I've been using (out of an old QF-1), but it turned out that this was not the cause.  The problem is something that Pete Juliano has lamented several times:  LC style analog VFOs have a tendency to have the frequencies "bunched up" at one end of the tuning range.  In other words, the tuning range is far from linear.  I was having trouble tuning stations on on the portion of the band where the frequencies were bunched up.  I did some quick measurement and found that on this side of the capacitor's tuning range, one turn of the dial would move the frequency about 100 kHz -- that is far too much.  On the other end of the capacitor moved  only 22 kHz with one turn of the dial (as I recall this is close to the recommended 20 kHz per dial rotation).  Clearly I had a lot of the dreaded bunching up.  This was what was making tuning difficult. 

I had built a pretty standard Colpitts FET VFO.  I had a 6.6uH coil, and a 9-135 pF variable cap in series with a 68 pF fixed cap.  I was pleased that the VFO worked, and I put it in the circuit.  Only later did the bunching up shortcomings become apparent. 

I decided to build another VFO, this time paying attention to DIAL SCALE LINEARITY. 

I turned to the excellent Bandspread Calculator on Bob Weaver's Electronic Bunker web site:  http://electronbunker.ca/eb/BandspreadCalc.html

I plugged in the frequency range that I needed and the values for my variable capacitor.  I calculated Cs which was the combined capacitance of the feedback and coupling capacitors.  Finally, I had to make a decision about the nature of my variable cap:  was it a Midline-Center Cap or was it a Straightline Capacitance cap.  I consulted with Bob and he suggested that it might be somewhere between the two.  I got out some graph paper and measured it -- it looks to me like a Straight Line Capacitance cap, with the capacitance varying linearly with changes in in the rotation of the shaft. 


It looked fairly linear, so I selected "Straightline Capacitance."  Bob's calculator predicted a much better dial scale linearity (see the picture at the top of this blog post). 

I then built the oscillator stage in LTSpice using the values called for by Bob's calculator: 


It worked well in LTSpice: 

So I built it in the real world.  I didn't have the exact values for the padder and trimmer caps, so I use values that were close. 


Using the frequency counter in my Rigol 'scope, I again measured the frequency change for each movement of the shaft. 

Here are the results: You can see that the bunching up has been largely eliminated.  Frequency change for a 20 degree (not %) movement at one end of the capacitor's range is essentially the same as it is on the other end of the range. 

I will continue to play around with the padder and trimmer cap values to get this VFO where I want it.  I may also have to opt for less frequency range in order to get closer to the desired 20 kHz per dial turn value.  I will also have to play around with the additional capacitance that will be switched in to move the VFO down a bit to the range needed for the 10 meter band. 

The bottom line here is that Bob's bandspread calculator is very useful in figuring out how best to avoid the dreaded bunching up of frequencies that can -- sometimes -- come with the use of analog LC VFOs.  The display of Dial Scale Linearity that appears at the end of each calculation is really brilliant, and allow for an instantaneous look at how changes in the various parameters will affect the linearity of tuning.  This is a really wonderful tool for the homebrewer. 

Thanks Bob Weaver! 

Tuesday, September 26, 2023

F6CRP's FB Homebrew Receiver


I like F6CRP's homebrew receiver.  I like the way he presents it (block by block) and I like the inclusion of the W7ZOI IF board. The JF3HZB VFO is quite cool (even though it is digital),   We have posted about this VFO several times: 

Denis has a very nice station and workbench: https://www.qrz.com/db/F6CRP

He also has some very nice videos on his YouTube channel: 

Thanks Denis! 

Friday, May 26, 2023

Coffee with Farhan VU2ESE (video)


Early morning in the N2CQR shack, May 16, 2023

-- Propagation
-- Web sites (RBN, PSK Reporter, others)
-- CW
-- Homebrew rigs
-- VFOs

Thursday, April 13, 2023

The Franklin Oscillator: A Super-Stable VFO. Why No Attention? Why So Little Use?

My Franklin VFO

Lee KD4RE of the Vienna Wireless Society has been talking about the Franklin oscillator. He has been telling us that it is very stable, and capable of stable operation up through the ten meter band.  Lee wants to build an direct conversion receiver for all of the HF bands with one of these circuits. 

I was skeptical.  First, I'd never heard of this circuit.  I'd grown up in ham radio on a steady diet of Hartley and Colpitts and Pierce.  Vackar or Clapp were about as exotic as I got.  And second, I'd come to accept that it is just not possible to build a good, stable, simple,  analog VFO for frequencies above around 10 MHz.  For example,  in his Design Notebook, Doug DeMaw wrote, "VFOs that operate on fundamental frequencies above, say, 10 MHz are generally impractical for use in communications circuits that have receivers with narrow filters."  DeMaw was known for resorting to variable crystal oscillators. 

But then this month Mike Murphy WU2D put out two videos about his use of the Franklin oscillator circuit in a direct conversion receiver at 21 MHz.   The VFO was shockingly stable.  I began to believe Lee.   I fired up my soldering iron and built one.  

WU2D's Franklin Oscillator

Lee was right,  it is in fact remarkably stable, even at higher frequencies. My build (see picture above) was a bit slap-dash and could be improved a bit, but even in these circumstances here is what I got.   This was with a stable 6 Volt Supply and with only a cardboard box covering the circuit: 

Local time                  Frequency

0543                           19.1114 MHz  (cold start)

0636                           19.1116 

0804                           19.1117

1034                           19.1118

1144                           19.1117

I started digging around for references to the Franklin.  There was nothing about it in Solid State Design for the Radio Amateur, nor in Experimental Methods of RF Design.  Pat Hawker G3VA (SK) did discuss it in his Technical Topics column in RADCOM, February 1990.  Pat gave a great bio on Charles S. Franklin (born in 1879 and a colleague of Guillermo Marconi). But tellingly, Pat writes that, "Despite its many advantages, the Franklin oscillator remains virtually unknown to the bulk of American amateurs."  

QST "How's DX" August 1947

It wasn't always unknown.   In the 1940s, we see articles about the Franklin oscillator circuit. There is a good one in the January 1940 issue of "Radio." 
 The author W6CEM notes that the circuit "is probably familiar to only a few amateurs."  It shows up in the "How's DX" column (above). And the 1958/1959 issue of Don Stoner's New Sideband Handbook we see a lengthy description of the Franklin oscillator.  Stoner wrote: "The author's favorite oscillator is the 'old time' Franklin, and it is believed to be the most stable of them all! This rock-solid device can put a quartz crystal to shame! Because it represents the ultimate in stability, it is the ideal VFO for sideband applications."  And we see a PTO-tuned Franklin oscillator in the July 1964 QST. And it is in the fifth edition of the RSGB Handbook (1976). 

Here is the January 1940 "Radio" with the Franklin oscillator article on page 41 by W6CEM: 
Here is the July 1964 QST article: 

There was an article about the Franklin oscillator in 73 magazine by W4LJC in February 1999: 
The author notes that: 


Much more recently (2022), Mike WN2A, modified his Mousefet transmitters (seen in QRP Classics in 1992) to include the use of the Franklin VFO circuit.  Mike's documentation is really excellent.  Kostas SV3ORA has a Franklin oscillator in his Super VFO circuit.  Hans G0UPL has one on his site. 


Look, there may be reasons why the Franklin oscillator has been ignored.  But the circuit sure seems to present a lot of advantages.  Stable operation beyond the 10 MHz barrier is the big one.  Simplicity is another.  If there are problems and shortcomings, let's hear about them. But it seems as if the Franklin oscillator may provide the opportunity for us to build stable VFOs beyond 10 MHz without resort to complicated PLL stabilization techniques, and without opting to go with an Si5351 or other complex digital devices.   

So let me ask:  Why hasn't the Franklin oscillator been given more attention, and why haven't we seen more use of this circuit by hams or even by manufacturers?  

Saturday, November 19, 2022

A 1966 73 Magazine Article on a Homebrew Permeability Tuned Oscillator (PTO)


In April 1966, Lewis Fitch W4VRV of Columbus, Ohio built a Permeability Tuned Oscillator.  It is remarkably similar to the devices we are building today.  

Lewis opened his article with this: 


Clearly, this guy was one of us! 

His article is filled with good practical advice on VFO construction, with a special focus on PTOs.  I was intrigued by the way his PTO mechanism allowed for the use of a reduction drive.  This would help us avoid the indignity of attaching a digital frequency counter to such a quintessentially analog device.   

Check it out: 
https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-DX/73-magazine/73-magazine-1966/73-magazine-04-april-1966.pdf

Page 30.  

Thanks to Michael (VE2BVW ?) for suggesting that I dig up some old 73 Magazine articles on PTOs.  A quick search revealed that there weren't many.  If anyone out there knows of good PTO articles in the ham or EE literature, please let me know. 

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

A Treasure Trove of Permeability Tuned Oscillator (PTO) Info and Links (Plus Info on Direct Conversion Receivers)

There is really great info on this page, and even more in the links at the bottom of it.  While the page is about PTOs, the links often discuss their use in Direct Conversion Receivers. I really liked the Tin Ear receiver.   And it was great to again come across the work of Alan Yates VK2ZAY.   Alan very admirably admits that laziness caused him to use an LM386 audio amplifier in place of a more virtuous discrete transistor design. 

 https://qrpbuilder.com/pto_mechanism

I bought one of the qrpbuilder PTO kits and I will soon put it together.  I have been having good results with a Glue Stick PTO and with a brass screw PTO form designed by Farhan and 3D printed for me by Dean KK4DAS. 

LET'S GO PTO! 


Friday, October 28, 2022

SolderSmoke Podcast #241 Mars, Direct Conversion, PTOs and Glue Sticks, Anniversary of the BITX20, Multus Proficio SDR, Boatanchor Station, MAILBAG

The board I use to test DC RX circuits 

SolderSmoke Podcast #241 is available

Audio (podcast):  http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke241.mp3

Video (YouTube): (215) SolderSmoke Podcast #241 October 28, 2022 - YouTube

Introduction:

Back on Mars.  Opposition approaching.  I have a Mars filter.  And (like T.O.M.) a Mars globe. 

N2CQR DXCC done

SolderSmoke in the WayBack Machine

Sticker news

PARTS CANDY -- Don't Scrimp with a Crimp! 

Bill's Bench

School DC RX projects -- in Hyderabad and Northern Virginia. 

Direct Conversion Receivers -- Keeping it Simple, Learning a Lot.  A step beyond the Michigan Mighty Mite. Do we really need 100db?  Do we really need to shield VFOs?  Farhan's super-simple and stable Colpitts PTO.  Audio amps, 1000-8 transformers and rolling your own LM386

PTOs and Glue Stick PTOs.  Paul Clark WA1MAC. Brass vs. Steel bolts.  #20 thread vs. #28 thread.  Backlash Blues. The best Glue Sticks. 

2 meters and the VWS.  Bill has a Baofeng. 

SHAMELESS COMMERCE:  MOSTLY DIY RF

Pete's Bench

20th Anniversary of the BITX20   Pete's early BITX rigs. 

Computer Woes

The Multus Proficio SDR rig

Simple SSB in China  BA7LNN

Things of beauty: Tempo One, NCX-3 and a SBE-33

MAILBAG

-- NS7V is listening.

-- Graham G3MFJ sent SPRAT on a stick.

-- Nick M0NTV  FB Glue Stick and 17 Shelf videos.

-- Dino KL0S HP8640 Junior

-- Mark AA7TA   Read the SolderSmoke Book

-- Steve EI5DD Connaught (Ireland) Regional News

-- Dave K8WPE  Planting the seeds of ham radio interest

-- Peter VK3YE Ruler idea on PTO frequency readout

-- Michael AG5VG Glue Stick PTO

-- Tobias  A polymath with UK and Italy connections.  And cool tattoos.

-- Alain F4EIT   French DC receiver

-- Michael S.  was in USMC, working on PCM/TDM gear

-- Alan Yates writes up Amazon transformer problem

-- Todd VE7BPO,  Dale W4OP, Wes W7ZOI

-- Farhan VU2ESE sent me an sBITX

-- Todd K7TFC   The Revenge of Analog

-- Jim Olds    Building QRP HB gear  


The Multus SDR rig Pete discussed

The older rigs Pete mentioned


My version of DC RX that Farhan is working on

My PTO with VK3YE's ruler frequency readout


Saturday, October 15, 2022

DC Receiver: 100db Gain? Diplexer? VFO in a box?


Here is a progress report on Direct Conversion Receiver developments. Dual Tuned Circuit, Diode Ring with Diplexer, PTO VFO from Farhan's Daylight rig, two stage 49 db BJT AF amp with a transformer. It works very well. I discuss: Shielding of the VFO -- necessary or not? Why brass in the PTO? Do we really need 100db in a receiver, especially with ear buds? Sourcing the AF amplifier's transformer. Using W7EL's diplexer. (I think it has solved my Radio Marti breakthrough problem). Developing a DC RX circuit that can be built by students. I end with a bandsweep of 40 meters that includes CW, FT-8, SSB, and AM

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

Monday, October 10, 2022

Listening on 40 with a Glue Stick PTO in a Direct Conversion Receiver; Some PTO History


Thanks to Paul WA1MAC for this idea.  He first shared it with us via the SolderSmoke mailbag in 2008! Sorry it took so long for me to try one Paul. 


The PTO itself is an old idea of course.  Here is an article from 1966: 
OM faced the problem of having to keep track of frequency while turning the dial many times.  He was hoping to use a turns counter -- in 1966 we didn't have the San Jian frequency counters.  I note that his PTO looked a lot like the one KK4DAS 3D printed for me (using file from Farhan).  

And some background on PTOs: https://sites.google.com/site/randomwok/Home/electronic-projects/permeability-tuners-last-stand


Sunday, October 9, 2022

Paul Clark's Dollar Store PTOs made with Glue Sticks or Chap Sticks


A few weeks ago Pete Juliano and I got some e-mails from Paul Clark about his use of Chap Sticks and Glue Sticks (acquired at a Dollar Store!) in Permeability Tuned Oscillators.

Dean KK4DAS, Mike KA4CDN and I had been experimenting with PTOs following Farhan's use of one in his new Daylight Again transceiver. We are also looking at simple circuits for use in Direct Conversion Receiver builds for high school students.
Yesterday, I noticed a Glue Stick on the floor under my bench. TRGHS. I built one of Paul Clark's PTOs and used it with the circuit from Farhan's Daylight Again rig. For the ferrous material, I just glued (!) a .5 inch toroid (I think it is #7 material) onto the moving internal part of the glue stick. For the coil I used a total of 9 turns of #20 wire, with a tap at 2 turns. You can see the results in this video.

I think it is really useful, a very nice way to get good frequency control using an item available in most super-markets (I bought two glue sticks at Harris Teeter yesterday!). This continues a long ham radio tradition of using household items for ham projects -- we started with breadboards.

 Some of Paul's coils: 


Some of Paul's data:

Here's the data I got in testing these on the NanoVNA:
Burt's lip balm
16t #24 insulated
brass tubing ferrule
80pf
9.93mhz-10.80mhz
3.21uh-2.714uh
Dollar Store PTO Forms in 3 sizes
Small Jot Glue Stick (8 for $1.25!)
1 3/8" of #30 enameled close wound
waiting brass tubing to fit cup
80pf
2.980mhz with no core, I'm waiting brass tubing to fit this one (we have no hobby stores around here anymore that stock the K&S music wire and brass tubing assortments)
35.65uh
Medium Playschool Glue Stick
36t #30 enameled
1/2" copper water tubing
80pf
2.96m-3.380m
36.13uh-27.72uh
Large JOT Glue Stick
1/2" copper water tubing
80pf
28t #24 insulated
4.995m-5.625m

12.69uh-10.00uh

Friday, September 30, 2022

Bandsweep with the New Homebrew 40 meter Direct Conversion Receiver


It is inhaling nicely but some improvements are still pending. Click on the video above to see and listen to the bandsweep done on 40 this morning. 

-- The front end consists of capacitive divider input impedance matching circuit, followed by one LC circuit and an FET RF amp.  

-- The VFO is a super-simple Colpitts design by Farhan.   The two feedback capacitors do double duty in the LC tan circuit.  

-- I am using an old variable capacitor instead of the PTOs that we have been experimenting with.  

-- The mixer is singly balanced using one trifilar toroid and two diodes.  We have found out that even with these three simple devices, there is significant variation in how people connect them to VFO, RF in and audio out.  I think we have found the best way to do this:  Be sure to put the VFO on the primary of the transformer, and let this signal turn the diodes on and off. 

-- For the AF amplification, I have one FET, followed by two BJTs.  I have a small audio transformer between the speaker and the final AF amp.  There is plenty of audio. 

You may wonder why, after all the SSB superhet transceivers, I am building a simple Direct Conversion receiver.  Well, we hope to help a bunch of high school kids build one, so we need to be really familiar with how it works.  And I find that as simple as it is, there is still a lot to learn in a project like this. 

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Building Farhan's PTO -- But Is This Really a PTO?

Farhan has a PTO in his Daylight Again transceiver.  This caught the attention of homebrewers around the world.  Walter down in Orlando built one.  Dean KK4DAS and I have built versions also. Dean has a 3D printer and made the coil support used in my version (above).  Thanks Dean! 
I had a little trouble at first because one of the capacitors I had in there was not NP0, so the device drifted a lot.  But once I straightened that out (I put in a Silver Mica cap in its place) the oscillator became very stable. Mine moves about 25 kHz with each turn of the bronze screw -- this is nicely linear tuning.  But I think I will have to use a San Jian counter to keep track of the frequency. The long plastic tube on mine is there to eliminate had capacitance effects. 

One of the guys in the Vienna Wireless Society questioned whether we should really call this a PTO.  After all, bronze has a permeability equal to that of free space. So we are not really changing the permeability.  Frank Harris points out that the bronze screw really acts as a shorted secondary.  What do you guys think?   Is this a PTO, or do we need another acronym to describe it? 

This has been a really fun project.  I never built an oscillator like this before.  I will probably follow up by building the rest of the Daylight Again rig. 

BTW  WA6OTP has a nice PTO design: http://www.wa6otp.com/pto.htm

Thanks again to Dean, and to Farhan.  

Saturday, September 10, 2022

The Cure for Frequency "Bunching Up" in Analog LC VFOs -- It Is Not So Simple. But we have a good calculator. Comments sought!

Bob's calculator shows good tuning linearity with an ordinary SLC capacitor 

One of the complaints about analog LC VFOs is that they have non-linear tuning -- when you turn the dial (usually attached to a variable capacitor) the space between frequencies is NOT constant.  This is especially apparent at the high end of the frequency scale where frequencies (and stations) appear to be severely bunched together, making tuning difficult.  This problem contributes to the defection of some great homebrewers:  They give up on LC VFOs and they switch to digital VFOs.  Sad. 

But there is hope:  Not all LC VFOs tune this way.  Even on rigs from "back in the day," back when the Si5351 hadn't even been thought of,  some LC VFO rigs tuned linearly.  My beloved Drake 2-B and my almost equally beloved HT-37 are good examples.  How did they do this?  How did they escape the dreaded "bunching up?"  

For a while, I thought that it might have had to do with the use of the series tuned Clapp circuit.  But on further noodling, this didn't seem to make much sense. 

Then -- like others -- I thought that it  must be caused by the adroit use of special capacitors. You see, in ordinary variable capacitors when you turn the dial, the capacitance increases linearly.  But in the LC circuit, frequency changes as the inverse of the square of the capacitance. Thus the bunching up. So the solution must come from the use of the special capacitors that compensate for this, that -- because of the shape of their plates --  produce linear tuning.  With these variable caps, frequencies on the dial are spaced out nicely, there is no bunching up. Great right?  

From Terman, Radio Engineers Handbook, 1943, page 123

Over the years, many hams have jumped to the conclusion that rigs with good tuning linearity MUST be using these special caps. For example, in 2013 a ham posted in the Antique Radio forum this message: 

There are three types of open, variable plate caps;
SLC= straight line capacitance where the capacitance varies linearly,
these are the most common and have half-circle plates
SLF= straight line frequency where the plates are tapered to allow
for linear tuning of the frequency
SLW= straight line wavelength, you get the idea...

SLF and SLW caps have oblong plates.

The effect on tuning a receiver can be dramatic. One example is the
Hammarlund SP series of receivers where the ham bands are very
compressed at one end of the tuning range. They used SLC caps
in the VFO. On the other hand rigs like the Kenwood TS-520
and FT-101 series have linear tuning across each band. These use
SLF variable caps. Most old 1920's battery radios used SLW
where stations were identified by their wavelength.

Well, not really.  

-- I now have several VFOs from the extremely linear-tuning FT-101.  But when you open them up to look at the tuning capacitor, it is NOT a Straight Line Frequency capacitor.  

-- Many of us over the years have built VFOs that are quite linear in their tuning without resort to these special capacitors -- we did it with ordinary Straight Line Capacitance caps.

-- When you look at the "How to build VFO" literature in the ham radio books, you see a lot of good recommendations about using solid, brass-vaned caps with ball bearings at either end.  But never do you see circuits that require the use of SLF or SLH capacitors. If they were the key to tuning linearity, we'd see them mentioned in the literature. But we don't.   

So where does the linearity -- or bunching up -- come from?  

The answer comes to us from a really neat calculator from Bob's Electron Bunker: 

http://electronbunker.ca/eb/BandspreadCalc.html

This calculator allows you to select your frequency range, and the tuning range of your variable cap. It then displays for you what the tuning range will look like on your dial.  You can see if there will be bunching up, or if the frequencies will be nicely spread out.  And -- and this is the really cool part -- you can then specify if your capacitor is SLF, SLW, SLC or Midline-Centerline.  This really illustrates the effect of the different capacitor types. 

I used Bob's calculators to do some experiments with various types of capacitors, various frequency ranges, and various combinations of trimmers and padders.   You can see what I did here: 

http://soldersmoke.com/VariableCapsSLCSLF.pdf

One important thing to keep in mind:  The SLF caps were made for AM broadcast receivers that were tuning from 540 to 1600 kc.  That is a 3:1 tuning range.  Most of the time in HF ham radio, we are tuning across a much smaller range, say from 5 MHz to 5.5 MHz.   That is a 1.1:1 tuning range. In those cases where we ARE tuning across a wide tuning range -- for example with a receiver covering 3-9 MHz, the SLF cap can help prevent the bunching up. 

But we can have fairly good linear tuning without resort to SLF caps.  Bob and his calculator point out that by narrowing the frequency range of interest, and by using either smaller range caps (ordinary SLC caps), or SLC caps with trimmers and padders, we can achieve tuning linearity.  And sometimes, when you have achieved this nice tuning linearity with a plain SLC cap, putting a fancy SLF cap makes tuning linearity worse. 

One piece of VFO tribal wisdom that is confirmed by all this:  It is better to use a smaller variable cap with a maximum capacity of about 30 picofarads. 

I think we should spend as much time focusing on VFO tuning linearity as we do on VFO frequency stability.  Bob told me that in the old days, the calculations for various tuning linearity scenarios were difficult.  But now we have Bob's calculator.  When building a VFO, just use Bob's calculator, plugging in the numbers to get a preview of what your tuning linearity will be like. If it is bunched up, you can play with the trimmer and padder values to achieve the tuning linearity you desire.   


Thanks to Bob of Bob's Electron Bunker for this great calculator. 

You can see another discussion of "bunched-up" tuning in the comments section of this article: https://www.nutsvolts.com/?/magazine/article/may2015_Whipple

What do you folks think of this?   Please put comments below. 

Designer: Douglas Bowman | Dimodifikasi oleh Abdul Munir Original Posting Rounders 3 Column